|
MEDIA COMPARISON
CHART
|
| 4-Excellent |
3-Good |
2-Fair |
1-Poor |
|
|
MEDIA
|
AIMED AT RIGHT
TARGET
|
CLARITY OF MESSAGE
|
COST PER
PROFITABLE CONTACT
|
PERMANENCE
|
FLEXI-BILITY
|
COMPETITION
FOR
ATTENTION
|
TOTAL
|
| NEWSPAPERS |
Distribution
wasted on a large scale
|
Succeeds
in clearly telling Who-What-Where
|
Very high $ when market is limited
|
|
Message can
be changed quickly
|
100's
of other ads competing for attention
|
11
|
| MAGAZINES |
In the case
of Trade Journals, generally aimed correctly
|
Succeeds
in clearly telling Who-What-Where
|
Specifically
in
Trade Journals,
fair; otherwise poor
|
May be visible
a week or two
|
Depends on frequency
of publication
|
Other ads prominent
and vying for attention
|
14
|
| RADIO |
Very high percentage
of "deaf ears" waste
|
Tells
Who-What-Where, but visual stimulus more effective
|
Much waste for
little profitable contact
|
|
|
Many ads in
quick sequence
|
11
|
| TELEVISION |
Large scale
waste, even on local stations
|
Visually and
audibly effective
|
|
|
As radio, can be changed momentarily
|
Many ads, one following another
|
12
|
INTERNET/
BANNER ADVERTISING |
Wide distribution
with very low conversion rate
|
May show Who-What-Where
in click-thru
|
Very low cost
per profitable contact
|
Visible a week
or two, but quickly disappears
|
|
Many other ads
competing for attention
|
15
|
| DIRECT
MAIL |
Can be precisely
aimed at decision-makers
|
Graphically
shows Who-What-Where
|
Low cost per
profitable contact
|
Discarded after consideration
|
Message can
be changed quickly
|
Surrounded by other
Ads, Offers etc.
|
19
|
| CALENDAR
ADVERTISING |
Direct to only
bona fide customers and prospects
|
Clearly shows
Who-What-Where
|
Very low cost
per profitable contact
|
Lasts a full
year - 365 Days, Everyday
|
Monthly copy
changes can improve flexibility
|
Advertiser has
"stage" to himself
|
22
|